When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant’s victim E (the “58 tax” written in the written indictment of 57) (the Defendant appears to be a clerical error, as it appears to be a clerical error) at the front of the D’s house located in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

During the time of each other, knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each statement of witness E and D recorded in the file for recording a witness among the third public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant (including a cross-examination);

1. A medical certificate attached to the police statement protocol for E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Although the gist of the assertion was that the defendant was unable to catch the victim by pushing the victim, the defendant was kneee and did not assault the victim's chest.

In addition, the injured person's act is not injured by the defendant.

2. Determination

A. The victim made a statement to the effect that it conforms to the facts stated in the crime in this court with an investigative agency.

However, there is a very concrete and consistent statement, and there is no particular contradiction between many statements, as well as the credibility of each statement of D, F and G, which has been witness, is high.

B. The injury diagnosis submitted by the victim of the crime of injury generally grasps the cause of the injury based on the victim’s statement, and the part, degree, etc. of the injury observed and judged by using medical expertise.