When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the use of a banner owned by the victim E by cutting it on the ground that he/she could remove illegal banner advertisements in front of the D on the street located in south-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Namcheon-gu, Seoul at around 15:57 on June 26, 2015.

2. 모욕 피고인은 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 피해자 F( 여, 27세) 이 쳐다본다는 이유로 거리를 지나가는 사람들이 있는 앞에서 " 뭘 보냐

The term "Cho, Chose Mada" was a big frista, and patently insultingly insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of F in the protocol of suspect interrogation of the police against the accused;

1. Each letter of self-sufficiency of E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to notification of illegal violations;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of the above two crimes) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the following: (a) the type and degree of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s same type of fine; (c) the Defendant suffering from the polar disorder; and (d) some of the circumstances that may be considered during