A. The plaintiff completed the marriage report on March 8, 1996 with C and 3 women under the chain.

나. 원고는 C이 부정행위를 한다고 의심하게 되어 C이 타고 다니는 차량에 녹음장치를 부착한 후, 2016. 1. 22.경 위 차량 안에서 피고가 C을 “자기”라고 지칭하면서 “피고는 C을 사랑하기 때문에 잔 것이고, 우리가 단지 섹스만 하는 애인 사이는 아니라고 생각했는데 C이 D 언니와 잔 적이 있다는 말을 하지 않고 속인 점이 괘씸하다”는 취지의 대화내용과 2016. 2. 3.경 차량안에서 두 사람이 성행위를 한 것에 대하여 대화하는 내용을 각 녹음하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence No. 1 and Gap evidence No. 2 (the defendant's transcript No. 2) asserted that the plaintiff's unlawful recording without the consent of the defendant, and thus, it is inadmissible. However, under the Civil Procedure Act of Korea which adopts the principle of free evaluation of evidence, the recording tape or the recording tape recorded by the stenography on the other party's secret recording on the other party's land cannot be concluded to be inadmissible just because it recorded a conversation with the other party. Whether to give evidence belongs to the discretion of the fact-finding court, and the defendant's above argument is without merit)'s whole

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. A third party who made a judgment on the cause of a claim shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of the marriage, such as intervening in a marital life of another person, causing the failure of a married couple’s communal living

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a couple's common life falling under the essence of marriage and infringing on a spouse's right as a spouse, thereby causing mental pain to the spouse, which constitutes a tort. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is aware that C is a spouse, and the defendant is aware that C is a spouse.