If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Automobile Management Act is the owner of 125cc Occ.

No one shall operate a motor vehicle whose structure, etc. has been modified without obtaining approval from the head of the competent Gu.

Nevertheless, on September 2012, the Defendant purchased the above Orobane with the change of the noise machine(s) around September 2012 and operated it in Mapo-gu Seoul by September 24, 2012.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as set forth in paragraph (1), operated otobs without mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of enforcement manuals and field control photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 81 Subparag. 20 of the former Automobile Management Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013); Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;