2. In full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the Defendant’s participation in the crime of this case is relatively insignificant, and the Defendant’s planned and intentional intent does not seem to have resulted in the crime of this case, and the Defendant’s participation in the crime of this case appears to have been participated in the assembly on the same day through the Internet or twitter, etc., and the Defendant’s participation in the crime of this case appears to have been contingent. As such, the Prosecutor’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.