beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.06.11 2019나58370

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations made by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence additionally submitted to the court of first instance after being duly admitted and examined

Therefore, the reasons why this Court is stated are as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the first instance except to write down or add a part of the following paragraphs 2.

(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act) Part 2. Cut-off shall consist of two to nine dimensionals in the judgment of the first instance as follows.

On January 17, 2008, the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor: (a) designated Ulsan-gun F and G workers as “C urban development zone” pursuant to Articles 3 and 9 of the Urban Development Act; (b) designated and publicly announced the development plan pursuant to Articles 4 and 9 of the Urban Development Act on February 14, 2008 (Public Notice of Ulsan Metropolitan City) and publicly announced the urban development plan (Public Notice I of Ulsan Metropolitan City); and (c) on March 11, 2008, the Defendant “C urban development project” (hereinafter “instant development project”) under the said development plan from the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor on March 11, 2008.

The project implementer was designated as the project implementer of Ulsan Metropolitan City on April 23, 2009, and thereafter, the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor revised the urban development zone on April 23, 2009 according to Articles 3, 4, and 9 of the Urban Development Act, revised the development plan, and approved and publicly notified the implementation plan prepared by the Defendant pursuant to Articles 17 and 18 of the Urban Development Act (Notice J of Ulsan Metropolitan City) (Notice J of Ulsan Metropolitan City).

Article 144 shall be added to "Article 143" in the fourth 12 parallel of the judgment of the first instance.

The 5th five pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the "district unit assignment" as "district unit planning".

The 5th 11st 1th 13th 1th 2th 2th 2th 3th 200.

Meanwhile, as seen earlier, the Defendant obtained authorization for the instant development project implementation plan from the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor on April 23, 2009, and according to the evidence No. 16, the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor was above.