beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.12.11 2018가단105446

임가공료 청구의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is about 4,065 to the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff).

Reasons

A. Each of the instant orders is “each of the instant orders.”

(D) The Plaintiff’s primary chrofing work was ordered by the Defendant to do chrofing work to the original body that received from D, and then released it to E. The Plaintiff’s primary chrofing work was KRW 52,973,50, and the annual frofing processing fee for March 2017 was KRW 2,233,264, and the annual frofing processing fee for April 2017 was KRW 2,264. E. (E) The Plaintiff sold chrofing 186 among the products released by the Plaintiff after chrofing in accordance with the first order.

2) Accordingly, on November 8, 2017, the Defendant sent G 21,80,064 won to the Plaintiff Company for settlement of accounts with respect to the above salt 21,80,064 won by the following calculation methods: * 5,000 won per life support unit price of KRW 8,00 per km x 1,500 color processing losses (Loss) - 9,975 won (8,000 won x 5%) - 36,000 won per unit price of KRW 30,000 (1,500 x 5%) - 1,06, 30,000 won per 2, 310,092 (9,975 x 310,1000 x 1636,000 won per 63,06,000 won per 636,1636,27,016.

2 As a result of the appraisal by the appraiser, REDD and WINE samples sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff at the time of ordering, among the products with salted by the Plaintiff according to the second order by the appraiser.