However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bone Star Co., Ltd.

On October 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above 05:30 on the 05:30 on the 05:0, while proceeding to the east of the breadth, at the intersection of the sphere in the eth parallel, at the same time and at the same time.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with good faith while driving a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to proceed in violation of the signal and received the left part of the victim C(49 S) driving Dpoter vehicle driving on the same side with the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as light spine in need of approximately 16 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim E (57 years of age) who is the passenger of the vehicle of the Defendant, injury to light dynaf in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim F (43 years of age) of the same passenger in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, such as salt, tension, tension, etc. in need of approximately 57 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim G (57 years of age) of the same passenger in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same passenger, injury to the victim H (35 years of age) of the same passenger in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and injury to the other dynaf in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, such other injury to the victim of the same passenger as the victim of the same passenger, as the victim of the same dynaf in need of treatment, etc., for about 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment] are the regular concurrent crimes, and the sentencing criteria are the same.