교통사고처리특례법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of Cknife car.
On March 18, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on March 11, 2011:40, and continued to proceed to the Dogdog from the surface of the government-type office building to the surface of the Dogdogdog in the front of the E Convenience point D in Sejong City.
A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brakes, and by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected and proceeded on the right side by negligence, and the telecommunication line owned by the owner of the telecommunication station and the owner of the telecommunication line owned by the owner of the telecommunication line owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation to the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle. Accordingly, the voltages attached to the said owner of the telecommunication line fall short of the voltages, and the F, which was driven by the said owner of the telecommunication line, was shocked on the right side of the G
Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above Ecoo vehicle owned by the victim H to the extent that the amount equivalent to approximately KRW 15,61,862 of the market value of the repair cost due to the foregoing occupational negligence is approximately KRW 2,068,00,000 of the utility pole, the repair cost, and the amount equivalent to KRW 2,613,037 of the repair cost, respectively.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Application of each written estimate statutes;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Optional fine of punishment: Considerations, the fact that the punishment seems to have been recovered from damage, and consideration of previous convictions (one-time fine of different species), etc.;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a car in Cknife.
The defendant, around 11:40 on March 18, 2015, driving the above car and front of the E Convenience point D at Sejong City.