2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:52 on October 2, 2014, the Defendant expressed that “C” located in Ansan-si B, which received 112 reports from the Defendant’s female-friendly Gu D, and sent out, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding handling 112 reports by assaulting the Defendant, “I am rith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, and so on.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A H statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, including photographs, 112 reported case handling lists, and opinions;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Social Service Order”) are being divided in the course of confession of the crime for sentencing, and a written application from D, which was the origin of the occurrence of this case, was submitted to the Defendant’s preference, without the same criminal records, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition.