강제추행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) around 09:0 in February 2013, the Defendant: (c) around 09:0, around 200 Gwangju-dong-gu B203; (d) the Defendant Da (17 years of age)’s her father’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012; hereinafter the same) and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 306 of the former Criminal Act. According to the records, the complainant can recognize the fact that he/she revokes the defendant's complaint on September 5, 2014, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.