Nos. 1 through 4 of the evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated, and 72,926.

The Defendant, on the third floor of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu D Building, operated a telephone room with the trade name of "E", and became aware of many females who wish to engage in commercial sex acts, and where a male customer requests to search in the telephone room or send a female to the place designated by the male customer to engage in commercial sex acts, he/she shall send the female to the place designated by the male customer to engage in commercial sex acts, and where contact is received by a male customer who wants to engage in commercial sex acts, such as "F", "G", "H", "I", and "J", he/she is a person who assists in commercial sex acts by sending a female to the place designated by another commercial sex broker.

On February 14, 2016, at the above telephone room around 19:00 on February 14, 2016, the Defendant arranged to receive 220,000 won from K, a male customer, for sexual traffic, to send M to the above place and to have sexual intercourse. From March 3, 2014 to May 20, 2016, the Defendant arranged to receive sexual traffic payment from male customers more than 3,404 times as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table from March 3, 2014 to May 20, the Defendant arranged to have sexual intercourse with female.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T;

1. Statement of the police concerning U and V;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (1463 pages of investigation records);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment has served as the period and frequency of the crime in this case, and the defendant served as the so-called supply of sexual traffic women to surrounding commercial sex brokers