A. The Defendant (definite person) was merely the victim D and the victim’s body fighting, and the Defendant did not commit an assault, such as walking the part of the victim’s growth, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the crime of assault.

B. The court below found the defendant guilty of the crime of injury (1) by misunderstanding the facts that he assaulted the victim's growth by walking the victim's growth. However, the court below found the victim not guilty of the crime of injury to the effect that the victim was unable to believe the above alley diagnosis or there was no causal relationship between violence and the mouth, based on the circumstances stated in its reasoning. (1) The victim's statement that the victim's appearance from the defendant was confirmed to be cut down by walking the neck from the defendant just because the time of the complaint was not immediately after the assault was not found (the victim was living in the same commercial building as the defendant, and first, the victim stated that the victim was only 10,000,000,000,0000 won and 200,0000 won and 3.0,000 won and 2.0,000 won and 3.0,000 won and 2,000 won, which were found to have been found to be a result of the victim's response to the victim's 2.