However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A(g)The Director of the C Medical Care Center, the Director of the C Medical Care Center, and the Defendant B is the Director of the C Thailand, and the Defendant (g) is a corporation established for the purpose of promoting the rights and interests of D and welfare projects, etc.

1. No defendant A or B shall receive the employment incentive by fraud or other improper means;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to receive the employment incentive that is paid to a business owner who employs disabled persons based on (g) the account transaction details as if they were employed inC, and (g) the Defendants entered into a false employment contract as if they were employed in C while operating E by receiving a successful bid from Thai City from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018.

According to the above public offering, Defendant A prepared and submitted an application for the employment incentive of disabled persons at the office of (g) the Gangnam-si Branch Office of the Gangwon-do Council on April 4, 2016, with the employment of G, H, I, I, J, and K that actually did not work in (g)C and submitted a false employment contract and account transaction document as if the monthly wage was paid. Accordingly, around April 7, 2016 and October 17, 2016, Defendant A received total of KRW 9,30,000 as the employment incentive for the five above five persons in the first quarter of the year of 2016, as shown in the attached list of crimes, and subsequently denied receipt of KRW 106,690,000 over 12 times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27174, Jan. 11, 2019>

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to receive the employment incentive for disabled persons in a false manner.

2. As described in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant, as the Defendant, C, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed a violation of the above paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police protocol of statement against L, M, or N;

1. Each statement of I,O, and P;

1. Each employment contract, details of each account, internal investigation report (to be submitted by the Korea Employment Agency for Disabled Persons), and accompanying documents;