beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.11.13 2019가단118388

원상회복 등

Text

1. As to KRW 54,00,000 and KRW 27,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the year from May 3, 2019 to July 1, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 3, 2019, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant for the lease deposit amounting to KRW 270,000,000, and the term of the lease from June 11, 2019 to June 20, 2021, with respect to the Guro-si E Apartment F (hereinafter “instant apartment”) as the brokerage of Licensed Real Estate Agents C and D, and agreed to pay KRW 243,00,000,000 on June 11, 2019.

(2) At the time of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to consent to the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease.

B. Since then, the Plaintiff applied for a loan of KRW 187,500,000 to I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) based on the above lease agreement.

However, on June 10, 2019, the day immediately before the payment date of the remainder of the contract, the Defendant expressed his intention not to receive any balance from the Plaintiff upon receiving the loan from the broker, and expressed his intent not to oppose the Plaintiff’s loan to the employee in charge of the I who made the telephone to verify the matters related to the Plaintiff’s loan of the entire loan.

C. On June 11, 2019, which is the date of the remainder payment agreement and the date of delivery of the contract, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant’s consent to pay the balance through the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the

On the same day, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the cancellation of the instant lease agreement on the ground of such non-performance on the same day, not only did there were no way to prepare any balance, but also did not have any place to be removed from the previous residence.

【Legal basis for recognition】