손해배상
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Determination
A. According to the above acknowledged facts, the defendant as an international marriage broker is obligated to examine whether personal information related to marriage is information about marriage and determine whether it becomes a member, and if an international marriage of a member is married, the foreigner's spouse shall enter into the Republic of Korea and have a real marital life commenced with the member. Thus, even though the plaintiff has a duty to verify whether the foreigner's spouse satisfies the income requirements to invite the foreigner for the purpose of marriage, failure to issue a visa to invite the foreigner's spouse because the plaintiff did not confirm specific information on income despite being aware that he/she is disabled in the first grade 1 of the brain disease, and thereby, the plaintiff did not perform his/her obligation to start a substantial marital relationship with the foreigner's spouse in Korea. The plaintiff's expression of intent to cancel the brokerage contract of this case due to the non-performance of obligation attributable to the defendant as above is 00 won or 50 won of the contract of this case, and thus, the plaintiff's restoration to 205 won of the contract of this case to 205 won of the contract of this case.
Modern, the plaintiff.