2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On February 14, 2014, the Defendant entered into a transport contract with the Korea Transportation Agency (hereinafter “CV”) under which CV goods were produced by the Defendant and the Defendant were exported to EST Doro-Gu Dorocoo Scoo (hereinafter “EP”); hereinafter “EP”); the Defendant entered into a transport contract under which CV goods were loaded on the ship and transported at sea and unloaded to BV EP shipbuilding (hereinafter “instant 1 transport contract”).

B. On March 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a transport contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff with the content of shipping and unloading the cream of this case on the ship at sea and loading and unloading the eEP shipbuilding station in Brazil (hereinafter “the second transport contract”).

C. On May 23, 2014, according to the contract of the second carriage, the Plaintiff manufactured structures listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant structure”) which are necessary for loading and unloading the instant crane on a transport vessel, and attached it to the instant crane.

The structure of this case consists of a pipe out of the outside (LUG), TRNO BLOK (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movable property”) and a flat board installed outside the instant corporeal movable property (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movable property”), which is a pipe installed inside and outside the pipe to be attached to the instant corporeal movable property, REFFE, which is a pipe installed inside and outside the pipe to be attached to the instant corporeal movable property. The method of installing the instant corporeal movable property consists of a pipe to be attached to the inside and outside the pipe. The method of installing the said parts first of all is to install REFENNNNS, which is to be attached to the inside and outside the pipes of the instant corporeal movable property, and to attach the corporeal movable property to the outer part of the instant TraFF CK and MAFNNES, which is to be attached to the said parts.

However, on June 5, 2014, the defendant's entry schedule was duly made in accordance with the provisions related to the first carriage contract.