beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.05 2017누90010

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) except for the case where "No. 3" of the third party of the judgment of the first instance was used as "No. 4", and thus, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of

(1) The plaintiff's appeal is justified in the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim, even if the plaintiff's appeal is not significantly different from the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and all of the evidence presented in the court of first instance were examined).2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.