어음금
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on February 4, 2009 in the Jeju District Court Decision 2008Da3960 decided against the defendants, which was brought by the future mutual savings bank against the defendants, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time.
Although the Plaintiff applied for the instant payment order on March 27, 2017 for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the judgment deposit claim, it cannot be deemed that the period of extinctive prescription exceeded ten years.
Therefore, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful because there is no benefit of protection of rights.