However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 16, 2018, 2018, the Defendant “I are under influence of alcohol” on the front of B in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, B, 112 reported and sent to the site, and when the slope D belonging to the Seocheon-gu Police Station Calkin, Seocheon-si, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home, the Defendant and the Defendant “Iskin sibb sib sib sib sib sib sib sib sib

Shee Doz. Doz. Doz.

In doing so, “,” etc., he saw the left face of the said D on one occasion by drinking, and assaulted the said D’s buckbuck site on one occasion and buckbucks, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order - The defendant mistakenly acknowledges and reflects his fault.

- Even though the police officer recommended the defendant to shoulder and return home for the safety of the defendant, it is very poor that the defendant took a bath and assault against the police officer.

The extent of assault by the defendant was too serious, so that the citizen who was in the past was trying to assist the police officer.

- After the commission of the crime, he continued to take a bath even after the commission of the crime.

- Other factors such as the motive for crime, method of crime, and circumstances after crime shall be determined as per Disposition.