A. The existence of the Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement against the deceased F and the deceased G is subject to paragraphs 1, 2, and 3-A of “a modified claim.”

paragraphs (e) through (e)

Each fact described in paragraph (1) does not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the statements stated in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), and evidence 5. Accordingly, the net Finance and the net G are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 18% per annum from June 30, 2001 to April 16, 2003; 16% per annum from April 17, 2003 to December 24, 2004; and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

B. The Plaintiff, as the primary debtor, was seeking the Defendants, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, to perform the above obligations inherited from the deceased F, the primary debtor, through F’s mother network E, and thus, the Plaintiff died on June 10, 2006 with the Defendant (Appointed Party) D and the designated parties H, and H, and I had waived their inheritance from F under Daejeon District Court Decision 2006Hun-Ma379, the deceased’s lineal ascendant at the time of the death of the Defendant B (the father of F) and the deceased’s heir from the deceased Party B, and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B had no dispute over the inheritance from the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B, and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B had no dispute over the inheritance from the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B, and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B and the deceased Party B’s heir No. 3.