A. Of the 473 square meters in W, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, 473 square meters, 44.4701 equity in Defendant B, and Defendant C, 250/473.

A. On December 15, 1914, YY was assessed on the 473 square meters in the Gamba-gun in the Gamba-gun in the former North Korea (hereinafter “YA”) (hereinafter “Seoul”).

B. On March 18, 1965, Z completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 15, 1940 with respect to the land 1 and the land 2, which is collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands,” with respect to the land 1 and the land 2.

C. Defendant V completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 1030 on January 23, 2008, based on the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (No. 7500) with respect to the land No. 2 on January 23, 2008, based on the gift on January 10, 1990.

Y On September 7, 1938, died.

Y The head of Australia’s family heir AA died on August 10, 1971 and his wife AB died on February 20, 1981; the head of South AC on February 4, 2012; and the South AD on December 8, 2004; and the head of South AD died on December 8, 2004; and there is a woman Defendant B (her married at the time of death of A).

AC’s heir has the wife of Defendant C, E, F, G, and H, and AD’s heir is Defendant I, Defendant J, K, L, and M, the wife of Defendant C, and Defendant J, K, L, and M.

E. The Z died on December 30, 1992.

The wife AE of the Z died on February 25, 2004, and there were Defendant N,O, Nonparty AF, Defendant P, Q, and R with the child of the Z. AF died on June 24, 1998, and the heir was the wife, Defendant S, Defendant T and U. who is the wife.

On the other hand, Defendant V is the children of Defendant V.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) part of the claim for ownership transfer registration due to the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession (each of the instant lands) was possessed by AG for 20 years with the entry into the said house, since the purchase of land No. 1 and land No. 1 and land No. 2 from AG around January 3, 1973.

As a result, the prescription of possession acquisition of each land of this case was completed.

Therefore, the Plaintiff is the owner of the first land, YJ.