2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant has committed each of the crimes in this case during the repeated crime period despite the fact that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes in this case, and has a family member to support the defendant, the defendant has provided a short drug while informing an investigative agency of a large number of drug criminals, and efforts have been made to conduct normal social life, such as obtaining licensed real estate agent qualification during the convict life, etc., which are favorable to the defendant, and that the defendant has committed each of the crimes in this case during the repeated crime period despite the fact that he had been punished several times for the same kind of crime before, and that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case during the repeated crime period. In light of the sentencing of the similar crimes in the same kind of crime, the punishment of the court below seems to have been determined in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, in particular, the circumstances and circumstances favorable to the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and the circumstances that the defendant cannot act as a licensed real estate agent for a considerable period of time.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.