계약취소에의한 매매대금 반환
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant Company is a juristic person established for the purpose of real estate enforcement, sales business, etc., and the Plaintiff is a person who served as a business employee from February 2014 to June 201 of the same year.
B. On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff, immediately after joining the Defendant Company, purchased KRW 65,520,000,000, which is KRW 302 square meters in Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gun, Gangwon-do. The Plaintiff completed both the registration of ownership transfer as to shares on March 666, 2014 and the registration of ownership transfer as to shares on June 19, 2014, for the remaining 364 percent due to the partition of co-owned property with D on March 19, 2014.
The sale and purchase contract for the above forest was concluded between the defendant and the plaintiff, the buyer, who acting for the owner of the forest.
C. On February 26, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased KRW 51,230,000,000 for KRW 51,230,000, and completed the registration of transfer as to shares on March 18, 2014, and the registration of ownership transfer as to shares on June 20, 2014 with other co-owners.
The above contract for the sale of forest was also made between the defendant and the plaintiff, the buyer.
On April 15, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased from the Defendant 331/9 of the instant land in KRW 35,00,000, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 21, 2014. On April 30, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased 66/9 of the said land in KRW 7,00,000 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 27, 2014.
E. On May 31, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased from the Defendant the purchase price of KRW 55,00,000 with respect to F forest land 397 square meters in Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gun, Gangwon-do. On July 8, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the said F forest land 350 square meters.
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 3, Eul Nos. 1, 2 (including Serial number), and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff asserts as follows.
In other words, in fact, the land in this case is very narrow and long, and the civil engineering works have not been carried out at all, and it is virtually impossible to construct the land, and the current market price and the current market price.