2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant had an attitude to reflect his mistake; (b) there was no record of punishment exceeding a fine since 1983, etc., that there was no record of punishment exceeding a fine; (c) the degree of injury suffered by the victim, such as the Defendant’s elements of sentencing or the aggravation of the bones; (d) the victim still seeks punishment against the Defendant; (e) the victim has been punished for the same violent crime; and (e) the records of punishment are several times; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, family environment, motive and background of the crime; (e) the means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, including the circumstances before and after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.