2. The judgment based on the constructive confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order based on the plaintiff's request, but the written objection does not specify the purport of disputing the facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of claim, and the plaintiff was not present at all until the date of closing the argument in this case until the date of closing the argument in this case, and was not present at the date of pleading in this court. Therefore, the defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of all the facts constituting the cause of claim in this case under the main text of Article 150(3) and Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25, 1989). On the other hand, when the court completes the lawful pleading and notifies the date of sentencing, such notification can not be deemed unlawful even if the date of pleading was not served on the defendant on the date of pleading in this case (see, 2004Da294, etc.).