2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On the following day from May 3, 2010, the Plaintiff’s king-Jin (C) was the old disability that occurred on May 3, 2010

5. 4. Visiting to a wood hospital affiliated with a university of Egyptian National University (hereinafter “Egypty hospital”) to undergo pharmacologic treatment under the diagnosis of “cerebral cerebral cerebral chymosis by cerebral chymosis.”

5. Since the discharge on October 10, in order to prevent “cerebral tension caused by cardiopulmonary dynamics”, the person was continuously imprisoned by prescribing the “componant” (a drug preventing the generation of serums through the suppression of the generation of cosinant) as an anti-sinant.

B. The Plaintiff’s treatment process and process 1) on July 2, 2012, as the dental clinic run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant’s clinic”)

2) Upon receipt of notification from the Defendant, the Plaintiff was constantly taking advantage of her to prevent cerebral dystrophism in order to prevent the recurrence of cerebral dystrophism. 2) Since 2010, the Plaintiff was aware of the need for her to perform schip and cryp surgery along with the diagnosis of “chystrophitis infection

8. With the Defendant’s direction 10.10., it received a written request for medical treatment stating that “if the urine in transit is suspended for more than seven days prior to the outbreak, it would be concerned with dental treatment.”

3 The plaintiff

8. 23. At the Defendant Council members, the head of the mold to be temporarily used by the time of the crypt operation was suspended for the following day after the suspension of the excessive uniforms, and then returned to the Defendant Council members after being able to do so.

4 The defendant

8. 31. 31. The plaintiff's 2 pawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn to the plaintiff

9. 7. Prior to the scheduled Switzerlanding implementation process, there is a risk of vegetableing, notifying the suspension and removal of vegetable uniforms before this framework, and subsequently, after checking the Plaintiff’s ging state, the vegetable surgery was carried out.

5 The plaintiff

9. From May 1, 200 to May 11, 200

9.7. The Defendant’s delegate.