except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 22:05 on August 17, 2015, the Defendant 112 reported that domestic violence occurred at the Defendant’s house located in Kim Jong-si apartment 103 12 dong 1210, and sent to the Defendant, and the Defendant living together with the Defendant by slope E, which is a police officer belonging to the Kim Jong-gu Police Station Down, and security guard F, and asked the Defendant to look at the circumstances of the instant case, “Ire police boms shall not hear women’s horses, flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick, and flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flh, and flick flick flick flick f flick fl.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning E and G;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the ground that there is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties.