beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.07.16 2014고정288

업무방해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

On April 1, 2014, from around 13:40 to 13:58 of the same day, the Defendant in the factory room discovered that, after receiving a notice from the Seosan Viewer on the street in relation to the "project to improve the E Residential Environment" of the Seosan Viewers in front of the public bath in Seosan City, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the Defendant was unable to pay compensation from the Seosan Viewer in relation to the "project to improve the E Residential Environment"; (b) discovered that the victim (the 46-year old) who was the executing company for the above D public bath site will carry out an underground construction where the F (46 years old) of the victim (the victim) who was the executing company for the above D public bath site, parked his car at the construction site laid the above public bath site; and (c) interfere with the victim's duties by force.

Judgment

1. The Defendant asserted that he was parked on the street before the Seosan City, Seosan City, which is his own private land, and was parked his own vehicle in the above place from the day before that time of the instant case, and was not demanded to deduct the vehicle before that time or before that time.

In addition, at the time of the instant case, the upper part of the said D bath was not carrying out construction, and the F was trying to carry out the works as excellent for his own private land, and the part of his private land was not interfered with F’s work, so it did not interfere with F’s work.

2. According to the records and arguments in this case, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant’s act constitutes a obstruction of business by the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, since it is difficult to view that the Defendant did not interfere with the construction of an excellent hall in front of the above D bath or has an obligation to cooperate with the above construction, and demanding the Defendant not to construct his own private land without consultation on compensation for his own private land.

Seosan-si and the defendant are the above D bath buildings operated by the defendant in relation to the residential environment improvement of the E district.