손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance was presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.
Therefore, the reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows, since it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of some contents as follows, it refers to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
“Each entry” in the fourth 8th instance judgment of the first instance court shall be added “K’s Witness to this Court.”
The 4th 10th 10th 10th 10 of the judgment of the first instance shall be "Establishment of a steel structure" and the 4th 13th 1th 13th "medical expenses in the Japanese Hospital" shall be respectively raised into "part of the medical expenses in the Japanese Hospital."
Between the 4th 16th 17th am and 17th am, “this court, including the result of the fact-finding on D(E) of this court,” shall read “this court’s testimony of K witness of this court, the result of the commission of document delivery to M hospitals of this court, the result of fact-finding on D(E) of the first instance court, to this court.”
After the fifth fifth and sixth of the first instance judgment, “No material exists” was added to “(as seen below, the above K immediately made a reinforcement work of the molding or sculed parts of the instant stage prior to the instant performance. In addition, the above K testified that the additional work after the instant accident occurred was installed more than the stage reinforcement.”
The 5th and 16th parts of the first instance judgment are as follows: “The 5th and 16th parts, including the floor in which another performer asserts that there is a defect, are moving from one end to the other end as of the Plaintiff, and success without any particular problem in the operation of a sprink and a public meeting.”
5 pages of the judgment of the first instance.