When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant was driving a cab for the victim C(60 years of age) in the New Station located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 26, 2014, and had the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The defendant is in receipt of a request from the victim to change the taxi fee, and the defendant saw the victim's blick with the hand floor on several occasions, and made the victim's blick with drinking.

As a result, the defendant suffered a safafafafafafafafaba which requires about four weeks of treatment.

2. At around 20:20 on the same day as the statement mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was forced to check the Defendant’s above C from the F slope belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station Emba, which was dispatched after receiving a report of assault at the above place, and the Defendant expressed F the desire to “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and F am am on one occasion by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. A taxi charge receipt, a report on conducting on-site service, a photograph of damage, and a stop for service of a police box;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles 257(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account various circumstances that constitute the conditions for sentencing, such as the payment of eight million won to the injured victim as a result of an contingent crime committed in the course of spreading the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that there is no criminal record other than a fine, and the fact that a mistake is divided in depth;