However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 21, 2016, at around 01:35, the Defendant: (a) completed the business from a business proprietor E to drink, and (b) went further to drink the request; (c) the Defendant listened to the horses from the Victim F (60 years of age) who performed drinking on the side table, and she was able to look at the horses from the victim F (60 years of age) who performed drinking on the table, and she was able to look at the victim’s head one time with the beer’s body, which is a dangerous object on which the table was on the table.

As a result, the defendant put up two strings, strings, and multiple strings in need of treatment for about 10 days to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing appraisal commission;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 1, 2008) (see, 2009Da1248, Apr. 2, 2009)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 1137, Mar. 1, 201)