If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant, along with D, who is a disguised marriage hub B, C, and Vietnam female, had D enter the Republic of Korea by pretending the marriage of the Defendant, and C arranged South Korea with the above D, and B made data necessary for the report of marriage, and the Defendant conspired to report the marriage by preparing documents necessary for the report of marriage in Korea in return for disguised marriage.

On March 27, 2009, the Defendant submitted to the Jongno-gu Office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Transportdong a false report on marriage with D and caused the public official in charge to enter the fact that the Defendant married with D in the family register information system to record false facts in the same electronic records as the original of authentic deeds by having the Defendant enter the fact of marriage with D in the family register information system. Around that time, the Defendant had the aforementioned electronic records kept in a false record and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Marriage report and marriage relation certificate;

1. Investigation report (report attached to the judgment, including B), application of the judgment-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 228 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 228 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of events, such as the original notarial deed), the choice of fines for each crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;