If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 5, 2018, the Defendant testified as “e.g.,” the Defendant testified to the Suwon District Court’s branch of Suwon District Court located in Sinju City 21-12, Sinju City 16:00 on December 5, 2018, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the special injury case against the above court 2018Kadan855B, and testified as “(B) He was aware of the illness,” and testified as “I do not have any enemy who was in the process of provokinging.” The Defendant testified as “I would at the time undergo medical treatment, and I would like to see at the time, I would like to “I would like to see if I would like to see that I would not have a face-to-face illness until I would go together with the police officer.”

However, in fact, the Defendant showed that, at the above case’s site, the Defendant was in need of a small-scale illness in the Do, and was aware of the fact that the Defendant was faced with C’s head at the time of the dispatch of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocols of examination of the witness of the accused in the third protocol of the trial for the case No. 2018 High Court Order 855;

1. Recording notes of the examination of witnesses in the third protocol of the trial of the court 2018 High Court Order 855 cases;

1. Court rulings in this Court 2018 High Court Order 855

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning C and B;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall interfere with the judgment that should be performed strictly, and the court shall cause the error of the judgment, thereby undermining the trust of the general public, which requires an appropriate punishment.

However, the defendant is accused of a criminal trial for committing any special injury during the period of suspension of execution.