beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단872

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving), etc. at the Daegu District Court, and two years of suspended execution. On January 11, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 5 million won due to a violation of road traffic laws (dacting driving), etc. at the Daegu District Court on January 11, 2007, and on May 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 7 million won by the same court on May 23, 2014, and was punished for drinking two times or more.

[Criminal facts]

1. A crime committed on November 20, 2015;

A. On November 20, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.100% in blood without a vehicle driver’s license on November 20, 2015, and driving a Fpoter II cargo vehicle with approximately 2 km from the roads in front of the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun to the roads in the same Gun.

B. When the Defendant, at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, was found to have driven alcohol on the road in the E-Do Police Station G Assistant H in the Cheongdo Police Station G assistant in charge of drinking on the roads of the Cheongdo Police Station, the Defendant, using his name and resident registration number of the Defendant who was known in the ordinary city, voluntarily stated I’s name in the sex column of the report on the circumstances of driving in the state without authority for the purpose of driving the Defendant as I and exercising his right.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the driver's confirmation column of the state of driving report, which is a private document under the name of I.

(c)

At the same time as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant exercised the foregoing investigation document by submitting to G Assistant H a written statement on the circumstances of driving which was forged in I’s name, as in the preceding paragraph, at the same time as in the preceding paragraph.

(d)

The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, provides a pro-friendly type I resident registration number of the Defendant, who was known in advance, to a slope H who asked the status of the Defendant, and make the statement on the state of driving in the report.