When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, at Jeju City 4, installed 2 magbs in the D party room for Defendant’s operation of the Defendant in the fourth floor of the C Building and planned to play a magbing and gambling at the D party room, received a fee for the provision of the table room from those who find out the place, and received a fee for the provision of drinking water, food, etc., and received the delivery of drinking water and food.

On September 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had E, F, G, H, etc. (each of the previous summary indictments on the same day), which found their places in the above D party room around September 14:0, 2015, put up 13 joints of each of them using 112 joints, and opened the 13 joints of each of them; (b) had a person, who promptly sees the same picture and number, etc., set a board by a method of drawing up a string the 500 won to all winners, and (c) received a charge for providing a place of 15,000 won per table from October 7, 2014 to September 2015; and (d) received a total of 3080 won from September 25, 2014 to September 38, 205 by means of the aforementioned method.

Accordingly, the defendant set up a place for gambling for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court (the fifth public trial date);

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, G, H, and E;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure and correspondence (a copy of seized books);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 247 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 247 of the Criminal Act chosen to impose a fine, and selection

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 10 (1) and Article 8 (1) 1 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds from Collection;

1. The following circumstances are considered in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the fact that the sentence is favorable to the determination of the sentence as ordered is recognized and reflected in the Republic of Korea.