Seized evidence referred to in subparagraphs 1 through 4 shall be confiscated.

On December 9, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. by the Ulsan District Court on December 9, 201, and was in force on August 9, 2011.

1. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a door door door from September 13, 2013 to 20:00 to September 13, 2013 among the victims E located in Ulsan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, which was not corrected, and intruded into the house into the house, and used the door door door door door door 2,50,000 won for cash owned by the victim, which was located in the small bank, and KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000, Japanese land paper 40,000,000, KRW 24K-si-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

2. On August 16, 2014, the Defendant cut off, around 01:0, the sum of the market prices of 300,000,000, including 28,050,000 won in cash, and 32,000,000,000 won in a catter by opening a back door in the Hart operated by the victim G in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and intrusion into the cat, and then exposing into the cat., the Defendant cut off the waste bags of KRW 28,050,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. An investigation report (verification of sunset time of the relevant crime);

1. A report on investigation (Attachment ofCCTV material photograph);

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (crimes during the repeated period);

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes (as to the crimes specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel argued that the defendant committed the crime of this case under the state of mental and physical disability, which is a shock disorder, although the defendant and his defense counsel argued that they committed the crime of this case.