1. 피고인은 2011. 10. 초순경부터 2013. 4. 30.경까지 경남 하동군 B에 있는 “C식품”에서 중국산 재첩을 재첩국으로 조리하여 판매 또는 제공하면서 600ｇ들이 진공 포장팩 23,700개(시가 73,500,000원 상당)의 원산지란에 “재첩쌀 30%, 재첩국 69%, 소금 1%(국내산)”으로 표시하여 소비자에게 원산지를 혼동하게 할 우려가 있는 표시를 하였다.

2. 피고인은 2011. 10. 초순경부터 2013. 4. 11.경까지 위와 같은 장소에서 위와 같이 중국산 재첩으로 만든 600ｇ들이 진공 포장팩 7,000개(시가 28,000,000원 상당)의 원산지란에 “한국산”으로 표시함으로써 원산지 표시를 거짓으로 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Each internal investigation report and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing each investigation report;

1. Article 15 and Article 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products through Relevant Provisions for facts constituting an offense and the Selection of Punishment;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the defendant's act of falsely indicating the origin of agricultural products, such as the crime of this case, constitutes a crime and reflects the criminal facts. However, the act of falsely indicating the origin of agricultural products such as the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, should be strictly punished as impeding the sound distribution order of agricultural products and undermining the consumer's trust, and even if the defendant had previously been sentenced to suspended sentence for the same crime, he again commits the crime of this case, even though he had previously been sentenced to suspended sentence for the same crime, and the size and method of the crime of this case and other various sentencing conditions in the trial process of this case shall be determined as ordered