However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around 09:50 on March 6, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim in a manner that the victim would have come to know at the time, while engaging in a conflict with the victim D (38 years of age) who is a management employee in front of the management office of the apartment of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, in the manner that the victim faces two times his/her head at the end of the victim.

2. On March 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obtained the NH physical card, which was owned by the victim E in the front of the Jinsan High School located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-ro 35, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled the property that he/she had on his/her own mind and has left the possession of the victim.

3. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in fraud and credit;

A. On March 15, 2018, at around 08:10 on March 15, 2018, the Defendant purchased rice tea from “G Mart” located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and paid KRW 2,500 for the purchase price, suggesting that the Defendant was the lawful holder of the NH fitness card owned by the Defendant, such as the foregoing 2, is the lawful holder of the E-owned NH fitness card acquired.

나. 피고인은 2018. 3. 15. 08:20 경 충북 H에 있는 'I 편의점 '에서 스낵 면을 구입하면서, 마치 피고인이 위 2 항과 같이 습득한 E 소유의 NH 체크카드의 정당한 소지인인 것처럼 가장하고 그곳 점원에게 제시하여 대금 650원을 결제하였다.

The defendant deceivings the point of view twice as above, and received goods owned by the victims who are the owner of the business, and used the lost debit card.

4. Attempted fraud.

A. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant, at around 08:17, the “I convenience store located in J in J in J in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-do,” attempted to take over 4,800 DNA tobacco 1 and Rabbs by deceiving the point of view as if the Defendant was the lawful holder of the NH body card acquired as above 2, by deceiving the point of view that he was the legitimate holder of the NH body cards acquired as above 4,800. However, the purport was not achieved due to the shortage of the balance of the said card.