However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From the beginning of August 2013 to October 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) leased Nos. 322, 705, and 1005 to operate a sexual traffic business establishment in the name of “E”; (b) employed female employees F and G, etc.; (c) received 80,000 won from male customers who were found through the telephone subscription and paid 45,000 won out of them to female employees; and (d) arranged sexual traffic by having female employees do the similar behavior under the above sexual flag of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure, seizure articles, photographs, officetels lease contract;

1. Imprisonment with labor, collectively, with respect to Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 19 (2) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and the Punishment of Acts of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the 82 pages and details of transactions among suspect interrogations by prosecutors against the accused];