도시관리계획결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following parts as set forth in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this Court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted to the court of first instance and this court are examined, the fact-finding and the determination of the first instance court are justified). 2. The part which was cited or added to the second instance
A. The phrase “determination of an urban or Gun management plan” in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance 15, 16, 17, and 19 as “determination of an urban or Gun management plan” in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance 200.
In addition, Article 15 of the National Land Planning Act provides that "A buffer green belt constitutes "a spatial facility among infrastructure" as provided by Article 2 subparagraph 6 (b) of the National Land Planning Act, and Article 2 subparagraph 4 (c) of the same Act provides that the designation of a buffer green belt is "a plan to install infrastructure" as provided by Article 2 subparagraph 4 (c) of the same Act. With respect to the land in this case, the designation of a buffer green belt can be deemed as a buffer green belt under Article 19 (1) 5 of the Housing Act, and Article 19 (2) added "A separate road" as provided by Article 30 of the National Land Planning Act after the third paragraph 15 of the judgment of the first instance. 3) added "A separate road" as provided by Article 30 of the National Land Planning Act as provided by Section 4 of the judgment of the first instance.