손해배상(기)
1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The previous plaintiff in civil procedure constituted an anti-government organization, which is the National Democratic Republic of Korea Student Federation (hereinafter referred to as the "Private Party Federation"), and tried to induce a riot under the order of the People's Revolution Party, etc., and was indicted for a violation of the National Security Act, a charge of violating the Presidential Emergency Decree, etc., and appealed for 20 years and 15 years of imprisonment with prison labor in the judgment of No. 14, 17, and 18 decided July 13, 1974, and appealed for 15 years of imprisonment with prison labor and suspension of qualifications at the Emergency High Military Court Council, and appealed for 15 years of suspension of qualifications and 15 years of suspension of qualifications at the meeting of the Emergency High Military Court, and was released from the court of final appeal on February 15, 1975 (326 days of confinement).
After that, the judgment of the court below was reversed, and the Seoul High Court rendered a judgment of acquittal on June 30, 1989 and the judgment became final and conclusive.
The Plaintiff filed a claim for damages against the Defendant on the ground that there was an unlawful arrest, detention, cruel act, etc. in the course of investigation and trial due to the foregoing Cheongsung case. In the Seoul Central District Court Decision 201Gahap39828 Decided January 28, 2012, which was the first instance court, 50 million won as consolation money for the Plaintiff himself and delay damages from the date of the closing of argument in the first instance court. While both the Plaintiff and the Defendant appealed, the Plaintiff and the Defendant appealed all, the Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na21906 Decided March 14, 2013, which was the appellate court, recognized as consolation money for the Plaintiff himself and the delay damages from the date of the closing of argument in the appellate court.
Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is currently pending in the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2013Da35290).
B. On June 1976, the Plaintiff for the instant judgment subject to a retrial is for the protection of national security and public order, such as the attached facts constituting an offense, while passing vocational training training training courses by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., and performing oil tanker pipeline works.