2. The judgment by the defendant's negligence causes irrecoverable damage to the victim's death, the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim's bereaved family members, and the bereaved family members want to be punished, but it appears that the defendant had consulted with the relevant specialized department at the time of the decision of hospitalization. In light of the victim's appeal, it seems that there were some aspects that it was difficult for the defendant to predict the possibility of her brycambling in full, and that the possibility that the victim's spathrosis, which is high blood pressure, contributed to the her brycambling together with her credit, can not be completely ruled out. The defendant deposited 5 million won to the victim's bereaved family members at the court below. The defendant deposited 55 million won to the victim's bereaved family members, there was no criminal history against the defendant, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., the prosecutor's assertion that the court below's punishment is too unjustifiable and unreasonable is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.