beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.08 2016가단518426

위자료

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 29, 2016 to December 8, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

In June 12, 1993, the plaintiff and C have two children under the chain of law as a married couple who completed the marriage report.

C around 2014, around 2014, the Defendant came to know of the Defendant.

Defendant and C sent the following text messages around August 11, 2015.

C: Potable to report

Party Defendant : I wish to report even.

C: Love Seas

Defendant: The U.S. Defendant sent his photograph to C around August 12, 2015.

C는 위 사진을 보고 피고에게 “ㅎ 멋져요 더운데 잘 보내고 오세요”라는 문자메시지를 보냈다.

In August 23, 2015, the Defendant and C divided the following dialogues in the tea around 20:49:

C: We need to keep a large face for a week.

Defendant: Having each week a week.

On November 27, 2015, the Defendant sent a text message to C, “I have been discharged from the country (at least from the point of view of whether the discharge had been made) to the point of view.”

The defendant sent a text message to the plaintiff on the day unfortunate that "I will not deny the delivery of crime to the plaintiff through good emotions."

Plaintiff

However, it is necessary, however, that the defendant will be able to recognize when he or she goes beyond his or her own ruling of why he or she is discharged.

Defendant : The President Park Don, Park Don and Park Don't know about how much it was.

Defendant: (Irre to the Plaintiff) is due to a mistake that could not properly observe the private placement.

Even if they were wrong, they made a mistake.

On December 30, 2015, the defendant and the plaintiff currency as follows.

C Around January 10, 2016, around January 10, 2016, the Plaintiff prepared a written oath stating that “I, in the future, accept all past misconducts claimed by his spouse, do not make any other male and female misconducts other than his spouse.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 12 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the third party constitutes the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with one of the married couple.