However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 05:35, driven Buer XG car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.09% from a section of approximately 1km from the road front of the water station in the Singu, Sin-gun, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, to the road front of the same Eupn-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. Relevant legal provisions, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Considering the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of probation even though he/she had the same criminal record in several times of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, strict punishment against the defendant is required.

However, the defendant's mistake is divided, the blood alcohol concentration is not high, the defendant is also sentenced to protection observation and community service order along with the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, and the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case.