A Imprisonment of seven years and fine of 400,000,000 won, Defendant B and C shall be punished by each fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

A A A Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance Project in this case") in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Group in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

A H Apartment Housing Reconstruction Maintenance and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Association of this case") in progress, but only the occupation of occupational embezzlement and occupational breach of trust refers to a "victim's association".

The president of the instant association has overall control over the operation, funds, accounting, contracts, personnel affairs, etc. of the instant association. Defendant C has been assisting Defendant A in several years as a side of the instant association. Defendant B had been in charge of the security service of Defendant A and security service at the reconstruction site in the trade name of “I” while operating the security service company.

1. Defendants A, who committed the joint crime, had a relationship of friendship with the ordinary citizen himself

J K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "K") operated by it.

In the case of interference with the business of the re-building corporation, the victim corporation corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "victim corporation"), which is the commencement of the re-building corporation, the victim corporation, and the remainder shall be referred to as the "L").

On June 2015, after being aware of the fact that the victim company was trying to hold an on-site presentation for the public tender of the said civil works, the defendant C, B, and the above on-site presentation was recruited to stop or neglect the above on-site presentation in order to accomplish K's order of construction works.

피고인들은 2015. 6. 4. 14:00 경 천안시 동 남구 H 상가 2 층 피해자 회사의 현장 사무실에서, 입찰 예정 업체 관계자, 조합관계자 등 10명 가량을 모아 놓고 현장 설명회를 개최 중인 피해자 회사 차장 M에게 큰소리로 ‘ 너 이 자식. 어린놈의 자식이. 자식 같이 봐줬는데 싸가지가 없네.

We look at who are within the military, and aftermatha knife.

Does it disregards the president of the partnership.

“A threat to the expression, etc., and as such, Defendant C, mutatis mutandis, refers to the expression “A”.

e.g. at the time.