혼인취소등
2015dern3262 Revocation, etc. of Marriage
KimA (************ 2***********)))
Busan Address
Busan District Court
Korea Legal Aid Corporation
KimB (**************************))
Busan Address
Busan District Court
January 15, 2016
January 29, 2016
1. The marriage reported to the head of the Busan Metropolitan Government Shipping Authority on January 28, 2013 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
The order is as set forth in the text.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 20, 2013, the defendant around 20:00 Busan ** the Gu* 2's * 2's * * 2's her name in the vicinity of an elementary school, and the plaintiff can engage in sexual traffic with her guardian even if she reported the marriage with her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her.
B. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff, who did not have been aware of the above assault, to file a marriage report. On the same day, the Maritime Affairs and Daegu Office located in Busan High-dong 2, Busan High-dong 2, required the victim to prepare a marriage report.
C. The defendant reported the marriage on the same day.
[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap 1 through 7 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings]
2. Determination
According to the above facts, the defendant committed serious assault against the plaintiff in order to obtain the plaintiff's report of marriage, and the plaintiff expressed his/her intention to marry because he/she was unable to visit such assault, which constitutes "when he/she declared his/her intention to marry by coercion, which is a ground for revocation of marriage under Article 816 subparagraph 3 of the Civil Code."
3. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.
Judges Kim Hong-chul