A and C shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

A or C fails to pay the above fine.

Defendant

A was the chairperson of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee organized on May 25, 2013 to stop the individual heating conversion work of apartment units, which was being promoted by the council of occupants' representatives of the Daejeon East-gu E Apartment Complex five, and the defendant C was the chairperson of the Provisional Women's Association established together with the above Emergency Countermeasure Committee.

Defendant

A and C conspired, from June 2, 2013 to July 2013, an assembly was held in front of the above apartment management office from time to time, and the fact is that the victim F, the president of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment housing, was at least 20 million won to repair the existing heat coheer in connection with the individual heating conditioning work, and even though there was no fact that the victim F, the president of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment housing, was at least 20 million won, the F day, which belongs to and destroyed the residents that there was a repair cost of at least 20 million won of the heat coheer who was at least 20 million won using the loudspeaker.

' repeatedly sounded ‘the honor of the victim' was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. Application of defamation video CD-related statutes

1. Relevant Articles 307 (2) and 30 (Selection of Fines) of the Criminal Act: Articles 307 (2) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A and C in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant A, C, and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants reported the materials of the council of occupants’ representatives (Evidence No. 1) and discovered that the victim F was 20 million won in the costs of repairing the heat-combined boiler, which was known to the effect that the Defendant was the cost of maintenance and repair.

The Defendants: (a) confirmed the H company, which is a heat-combined boiler repair company; and (b) determined that the repair cost was at least 4.2 million won; and (c) determined that it was an item identical to the above maintenance and repair cost; and (d) it was true that the Defendants stated the facts.