2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 14:00 on June 26, 2014, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the insult case against F in the court No. 215 of the Changwon District Court No. 2014No395 of the said court, which was located in 669, as the Changwon-si Changwon-si Changwon.

The Defendant testified before the second criminal trial division of the above court in the trial of the case as follows: (a) the Defendant testified to G that “However, the Defendant did not have heard that he would have “I would like to do so,” and continuously testified to the question “I would like to say that I would like to say, “I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say, “I would like to say, I would like to see that I would not have any sound,” and “I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say, “I would like to say, I would like to say, I would like to say,” and “I would like to say, I would like to say, “I would like to see, even if I would like to see, I would like to say, I would like not have any sound.”

However, at around 00:21 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant expressed that F would take a bath against G, and that F would take a bath against “Mata”, the Defendant was immediately adjacent to F, and the Defendant spawned F.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each interrogation protocol of the prosecution against H and I;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness (G, H, I, and the defendant);

1. Court rulings (2013Gohap787);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV image analysis);

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines - [Scope of recommendations] Type 1 (Perjury of Perjury) and the basic area (six months to one year and six months) - [special person] of the sentencing guidelines;

2. The normal defendant, taking into account, vindicates for his offence.