beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.26 2017고단311

사기

Text

Defendant :

1. A person who commits an offense shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five months;

2. Criminal 2:

(a) One year;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On August 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 19, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Officetel; (b) around June 20, 2014, the Defendant, a representative director, was delegated services, such as the establishment of a management and disposal plan, from this C to the third party of the management and disposal service provider (ju) of the E-building reconstruction project; and (c) did not have any authority over the construction of the said reconstruction project; and (d) was delegated to the Defendant F with the right to obtain approval with respect to removal, electricity, and pent installation, etc. from the third party, the urban rearrangement entity of the E-building reconstruction project.

8.0 billion won is required to be paid down by the Corporation as the priority subject of the construction with a site fence in the amount of 8 billion won.

The term "the amount of KRW 200 million is changed as the construction deposit."

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) received from the victim the delivery of KRW 45 million on June 20, 2014 as the deposit money for construction of pents; and (c) KRW 50 million on June 30, 201; and (d) KRW 50 million on June 30, 201.

2. On February 4, 2015, the fraud defendant related to the right to sell apartment units and commercial buildings located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (State) H office, and the fact that the defendant did not have the right to sell apartment units and commercial buildings in the above (State) D's reconstruction apartment units and commercial buildings. In addition, the defendant knew that this NC had not received the right to sell apartment units from the reconstruction association in the above (State), but he had the right to sell the general apartment units and commercial buildings of J, which is the reconstruction apartment units of D's reconstruction apartment units, to the victim I who is the actual operator of H (State).

The right to sell in lots will be given.

It is intended to return KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.

“A false representation was made.”

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim.